Supreme Court of India
Shibu Soren v. Dayanand Sahay and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant was holding his office under the State Government.
Judgment, page 31
From the headnote
Election Laws: Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959-Disqualification I of member of Parliament-Exemption from disqualification by Parliament eld, the office of the Interim Jharkhand Area Autonomous Council set up under the relevant Act is not included under the Schedule to the I959 Ac/ Chairman of Interim Council does not enjoy the status of a Minister- Disqualification not removed by Parliament-Hence, the appellant is disqualified ji-om being member of Rajya Sabha-Constitution of India Article 102(J)(a). Constitution of India-Article 102(1}(a}-Disqualification of member
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 State Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna & Others v. Janakdhari Prasad and Others
- 2012 Purno Agitok Sangma v. Pranab Mukherjee
- 2010 Anokh Singh v. Punjab State Election Commission
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.