Supreme Court of India
Hanuman Prasad Bagri and Ors. v. Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Company Law : Companies Act, 1956-Sections 397, 398-Petition on grounds of op pression and mismanagement-Finding by Company Judge regarding misman agement-No finding of just and equitable grounds for winding up and other wise it will cause hardship to petitioners-Appeal allowed by Division Bench Held, interpretation given by Division Bench is just and proper. On a petition filed by the Appellant-Petitioners under Sections 397 c & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Company Judge held that the petitioners' grievance in regard to ouster from the management of the company is legitimate and
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- 2011 Chatterjee Petrochem (i) Pvt. Ltd. v. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.