Supreme Court of India
M.narsinga Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section JU legal presumption Held. can be drawn if it is proved that the accused has accepted or agreed to accept any gratification, the same need not be proved through direct evidence- -Inferences drawn from facts produced or proved are akin to presumptions in law Evidence Act, 1872 Section 114. Words and Phrases - 'Shall be presumed' and 'proof' Meaning of--ln the context of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -Section 20(/). Appellant was charged for offences under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, being
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Narendra Champaklal Trivedi v. State of Gujarat
- 2023 Neeraj Dutta v. State (govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
- 2022 Neeraj Dutta v. State (govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2019 Mrs. Neeraj Dutta v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi)
- 2015 Vinod Kumar v. State of Punjab
- 2014 Vijay Pal Singh and Others v. State of Utiarakhand
- 2014 Satvir Singh v. State of Delhi through Cbi
- 2012 N.V. Subba Rao v. State, through Inspector of Police, Cbi/spe,visakhapatnam, A.P.
Of those, 1 relied on · 8 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.