Supreme Court of India
State Govt. Houseless Harijan Employees Association v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
land Acquisition Act, 1894-Sections 3(j)(vi), 4(1), 6(1), 6(1- ), 9, sub-Sections (/) and (2) of Section 48· Acquisition- Withdrawal of·- Justiciability of Beneficiary ef acquisition- -Right to be heard --Notification under Section 48(1) for withdrawal of acquisition-Appellant/beneficiary given no opportunity of being heard before such notification-legality of Held, the State Government could not have withdrawn from the acquisition without hearing the appellant- Though Section 48(1) has been construed to exclude the owner's right to be heard before withdrawal of acquisition, there is no
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad through Housing Commissioner v. Ram Singh (d) Th. Lrs. & Ors.
- 2025 Krishnadatt Awasthy v. State of M.P. & Ors.
- 2019 M/s. Vinayak House Building Cooperativesociety Ltd. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
- 2013 Kn Aswathnarayana Setty (d) Tr. Lrs. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.