Supreme Court of India
D.P. Chadha v. Triyugl Narain Mishra and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Advocates Act, 1961- Sections 37 and 38- Professional Misconduct. meaning- Advocate, engaged by complainant in an ejectment suit, utilised signed blank vakalatnarna and blank paper in a compromise petition to the detrimental to the interest of the complainant without his knowledge Decree passed against the complainant without personal presence of complainant-State Bar Council and Bar Council of fndia holding advocate guilty of professional misconduct Held, findings concurred with-Advocate guilty of profesoional mis-conduct-.. ·Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Order 2 3 Rule 3. Power of Bar
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Lal Bahadur Gautam v. State of U.P. and Others
- 2010 Smt. Poonam v. Sumit Tanwar
- 2013 In Re: Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate v..
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.