Supreme Court of India
Surjit Kaur v. Naurata Singh and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the above reasons, we are of the view that the Order dated 19th October, 1992 passed by the first Appellate Court and the Order of the High C Court dated 15th December, 1992 cannot be sustained and requires to be and are hereby set aside.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Specific Relief Act, 1963-Section 12 (3)-Specific performance of contract-Agreement for sale could not be executed as alienation was restrained by order of Court-Trial Court ordered refund of advance paid along with compensation-Appeal filed before High Court for enhancement of compensation was allowed, wherein it was stated for the first time that execution was possible without delivery of possession-Second Appeal filed against the order to execute the agreement was dismissed-On appeal held, where contract is incapable of being performed in whole and a party categorically refused to accept
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Jaswinder Kaur (now Deceased) through. v. Gurmeet Singh and Ors
- 2005 Surinder Singh v. Kapoor Singh (d) through Lrs. and Ors.
- 2004 Hpa International v. Bhagwandas Fateh Chand Daswani and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.