Supreme Court of India
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mango Ram
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that sentence already undergone by the accused would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice, and we do according! y.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
c Penal Code, 1860-Sections 375 and 376-Rape-Proof of o.lfence Consent for sexual act-Held, the offence is committed; submission under fear o.f terror cannot be construed as a consented sexual act. Respondent-accused, aged about 17 years, committed rape of his niece, a minor girl. The girl told her father about the incident, who re ported the matter to the police. The accused was arrested. Trial Court acquitted the accused on the ground that the offence of rape had not been established by the prosecution; that she was above the age of 16 years; and that there was consent by her for the
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Parhlad and Anr. v. State of Haryana
- 2013 Kaini Rajan v. State of Kerala
- 2011 State of U.P. v. Chhoteylal
- 2013 Roop Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2013 Dilip v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.