Supreme Court of India
R.d.saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Advocates Act, 1961-Section 35-Professional misconduct-Case file of client withheld by Advocate for non-payment of fees-Bar Council debarred him from practice for 18 months and imposed fine of Rs. 1000-Considering it to be a professional misconduct-On appeal-Held, case.files cannot be equated with "goods" or "goods bailed" as they have no marketability Cause of litigant far more important than right of an Advocate for his remuneration-Such a practice can never be permitted-However, an Advo cate may adopt alternate legal remedies to recover his fees-It is not only a legal duty but it is also
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.