Supreme Court of India

Eskayef (now Known as Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (india) Ltd. Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-ii, Bangalore

Neutral citation
Reported as [2000] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 634
Bench S.P. Bharucha and Ruma Pal JJ.
Decided 20 July 2000

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

In the result, we are not persuaded to take a view other than that taken by the High Court.

Judgment, page 8

From the headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961-Section 37-Liability to pay surtax-Whether an admissible deduction in computing total income-Held, not deductible. Section 37(3A)-Expenditure incurred on distribution of free samples of prescription drugs to doctors-Whether in the nature of advertisement or publicity or sales promotion falling within the restrictive provisions of the section-Held yes. Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954- Section 3-Prohibition of publication of advertisement of a drug-Held, prohibition not applicable to physician's samples. In these appeals, the following two

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.