Supreme Court of India
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, through its Registrar v. Shashikant S. Patil and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law: c Departmental enquiry-Findings in-Binding nature of-On disciplinary authority-Held: Inquiry is primarily intended to afford the delinquent officer an opportunity to meet the charges-Findings of Inquiry Officer not binding on disciplinary authority-Disciplinary authority can come to its own conclusions bearing in mind the views of Inquiry Officer Otherwise, the position of the disciplinary authority would get relegated to liSttbordinate level-Jn the circumstances of the case, High Court erred in interfering with a well considered order passed by the disciplinary authority
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 The State of Karnataka & Anr. v. N. Gangaraj
- 2019 Ram Murti Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- 2013 Registrar General High Court of Gujarat & Anr. v. Jayshree Chamanlal Buddhbhatti
- 2022 Muzaffar Husain v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
- 2012 Registrar General, Patna High Court v. Pandey Gajendra Prasad & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.