Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : Section 102-Police officer-Power to seize property- 'Property' Include Bank account and therefore capable of being seized-Applicability of Section 102-Necessary conditions for. Accused-Commission of offences-Investigation-Seizure by Police Officer-Instructions by Investigating Officer prohibiting operation of Bank account-Held legal. Words & Phrases: 'Property '-Meaning of-Section 102-Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Respondent was working as an Architect and Town Planner in the Department of Town Planning of the Union Territory of Daman and Diu. While
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Teesta Atul Setalvad v. The State of Gujarat
- 2024 Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen & Ors.
- 2019 Nevada Properties Private Limited through its Director v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.