Supreme Court of India
Pon Adithan v. Deputy Director, Narcotics Control Bureau, Madras/. I
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Law : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-Section 50(1)-Contraband article-Search and seizure of-Right of accused-To be searched in the presence of gazetted officer or a Magistrate-Intelligence Officer, who searched the accused, deposed about due compliance with S.50(1)-However, no independent evidence or other supportive documentary evidence-Held: In the circumstances of the case, oral evidence of Intelligence Officer sufficient for Proving due compliance with S. 50(1)-Subsequent involvement of Intelligence Officer in a case under the Act, inconsequential. Section
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2013 Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2008 Vinod Solanki v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2008 Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2008 Kanhaiyalal v. Union of India and Ors.
Of those, 5 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.