Supreme Court of India
Rajendra Prasad v. The Narcotic Cell through its Officer Incharge, Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 311-Prosecution seeking resummoning of witnesses after evidence was closed-Whether power under this Section can be exercised to fill up lacuna in Prosecution case-Held : oversight or mistakes during conducting of case cannot be understood as lacuna and can be corrected. Words & Phrases. "Lucuna in Prosecution case"-Meaning of Appellant along with certain other persons was tried. before a Court of Sessions for offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psych'otropic Substance Act, 1985. After the evidence was closed by the Prosecution and the defence, the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2016 State of Haryana v. Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
- 2014 Mannan Sk & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- 2013 Sister Mina Lalita Baruwa v. State of Orissa and Others
- 2013 Natasha Singh v. Cbi (state)
- 2012 Deepak Khinchi v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 5 relied on · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.