Supreme Court of India
J. Jayalalitha Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the power conferred upon the Central F Government under Section 4(2) is also to be exercised if that becomes 'necessary'.
Judgment, page 23
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA), S.3-Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 21-Notification issued by State government establishing three additional Sessions Court at Chennai and appointing Judges of those courts as Special judges to try exclusively cases of corruption against former Chief Minister and other ministers-Challenged on ground that neither the Act nor S.3 disclosed any policy for deciding when a special judge could be appointed-Held, provisions sufficiently indicate the object that cases of corruption shall be tried speedily which is the policy of the Act and underlies
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Moons Technologies Ltd. (formerly Known as Financial Technologies India Ltd.) & Ors. v. Union of India
- 2015 Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal Etc. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- 2015 M/s. Spentex Industries Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Ors.
- 2012 Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Dr. Manmohan Singh and Another
Of those, 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.