Supreme Court of India

State through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/sit Etc. v. Nalini and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Neutral citation

Reported as [1999] 3 S.C.R. 1

Bench K.T. Thomas, D.P. Wadhwa and Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JJ.

Decided 11 May 1999

Status Distinguished

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

19 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that Nalini (A-1), Santhan (A- 2), Murugan (A-3) and Arivu (A-18) are guilty they do not deserve the extreme penalty.

Judgment, page 384

From the headnote

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) ACT. 1987: Ss. 15, 21-Evidentiary value of confession recorded by Police Officer under S. 15 against its maker and against co-accused, abettor or Conspirator-Effect of non-obstante clause in S. 15(1)-S. 30 of Evidence Act, whether excluded-Amending Act 43 of J993-Addition of words "or co accused, abettor or conspirator" in S. J 5 (1) and deletion of clauses (c) and (d) of S. 2 J-Effect of-Confession of an accused-Admissibility as a substantive evidence against himself as well as a co-accused, abettor or Conspirator. S. J 5-Vo/untary

Authorities it was built on

1964 Masalti v. State of U. P cited by 86
1955 Willie (william) Slaney v. The State of Madhya Pradesh. cited by 64
1956 Jaswantrai Manilal Akhaney v. The State of Bombay. cited by 17
1999 Suthenthiraraja@ Santhan and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. State through Dsp/cbi, Sit, Chennai Etc. Etc. cited by 8

Where later benches applied it

2025 Manoj Tejraj Jain v. State of Gujarat relied on
2024 P. Manikandan v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors. relied on
2017 Mukesh & Anr. v. State for Nct of Delhi & Ors. relied on
2016 Mohd. Jalees Ansari and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation relied on
2015 Indra Dalal v. State of Haryana relied on
2008 Mohmed Amin @ Amin Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh & Anr. v. C.b.i through its Director relied on
2024 Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others referred to
2019 Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr v. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc referred to
2018 Surinder Kumar Khanna v. Intelligence Officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence referred to
2016 Somasundaram @ Somu v. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police referred to
2015 Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors. referred to
2015 State of J & K v. Wasimahmed Malik@ Hamid and Another referred to
2014 Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal referred to
2014 Periyasami S/o. Duraisami Novanagar v. State Represented through the Inspector of Police, Q B.ranch Cid, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu referred to
2013 Sanjay Dutt (a-117) v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi (stf), Bombay referred to
2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay referred to
2011 Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State of Nct of Delhi referred to
2012 Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharashtra distinguished
2020 Raja @ Ayyappan v. State of Tamil Nadu not applicable

Of those, 6 relied on · 1 distinguished · 11 referred to · 1 not applicable

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.