Supreme Court of India
State of Haryana v. S.K. Singhal
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal preferred by the State is dismissed B but in the circumstances without costs.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Punjab Civil Service Rules (Vol. II) Rule 5. 32 (2) proviso-Respondent after completing twenty years' qualifying service giving notice of voluntary retirement-Appointing authority not refusing permission for retirement within three months' notice period-Whether on the express wording of the rule retirement became automatically effective from the expiry of the notice period Held, yes The respondent joined service on June 4, 1975 and was working as Medical Officer. On August 16, 1995 the respondent issued a notice to the appellant seeking voluntiary retirement. Under the proviso to sub-rule
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Achal Singh
- 2026 Uco Bank v. Sk Shrivastava
- 2011 State of U.P. & Ors v. Luxmi Kant Shukla
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.