Supreme Court of India

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. R. Veerasw Amy and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1999] 2 S.C.R. 221
Bench Sujata V. Manohar, K. Venkataswami and R.C. Lahoti JJ.
Decided 26 March 1999

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the retired employees (respondents), who had retired from service before 1.7.1986 and those who were in employment on the said date, cannot be treated alike as they do not belong to one class.

Judgment, page 9

From the headnote

Service Law : " Electricity (SUf!PlY) Act, 1948-Section 79-Pension Scheme- Prospective introductioh.-Respondents who had retired earlier governed by the contribu.tory provident fund-Cut-off date prescribed by the Employer Electricity Board-Validity of-Held-Board not acted contrary to law-Employees cannot-compel the Board to extend the pension scheme with retrospective ejfect-Cut~ojf date valid-Constitution of India, 1950-Articles 14 and 18 . The Government of Tamil Nadu, introduced a pension scheme vide GOMS No. 797 dated 30.6.1969. The appellant-Board had not adopted the Scheme till 1986.

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.