Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra and Co.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940 : c Sec. 29-Award of interest-Works contract-Claim for payment for the works done-Dispute-Arbitration-Award granting interest-Clause 1.9 of Special Conditions of Contracts stipulating that interest cannot be claimed for the amount lying with the Government due to any dispute-Effect of- Held, claim of interest for payment for the work done, is not covered under the specified type of amount mentioned in Clause 1.9-Thus, the claim is not barred-Award of interest justified. Sec. 29-Power of Arbitrator to grant interest pendente lite-Held, Arbitrator has power and authority
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 Pam Developments Private Limited v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
- 2018 Reliance Cellulose Products Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
- 2016 M/s Harish Chandra & Company v. State of U.P. Thr. Superintending Engineer
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.