Supreme Court of India
V. Kasturi v. Managing Director, State Bank of India, Bombay and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law : State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules, 1979: c Rule 22(J)(c)-Pension-Additional benefit-Retired employee Entitlement to-Held: If a person is entitled to pension at the time of his retirement, he is entitled to enhanced pension brought into force after his retirement, since he is a member of the same class of pensioners when the additional benefit is conferred on all of them-In such a situation, the additional benefit cannot be denied to him on the ground that he has retired prior to the date of coming into force of the additional benefit-Constitution of India, 1950,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Suchet Singh Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2016 Lic of India and Others v. Krishna Murari Lal Asthana and Another Etc.
- 2015 A.N. Sachdeva (dead) by Lrs. & Ors. v. Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak &anr.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.