Supreme Court of India

C.N. Rudramurthy Etc. v. K. Barkatulla Khan and Ors. Etc.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1998] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 196
Bench M.M. Punchhi, G.B. Pattanaik and S. Rajendra Babu JJ.
Decided 8 October 1998

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the first respondent be D given some reasonable time to vacate the premises and which in this case we consider will be a period upto 30th of June, 1999 subject to the filing of usual undertaking within four weeks from today.

Judgment, page 8

From the headnote

Rent Control and Eviction Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961-S. 31-Eviction suit- lnapplicability of the provisions of the Act to premises whose monthly rent exceeds Rs. 500/-Supreme Court holding in . . Bhatia 's case that provisions of S. 3(c) of Delhi Rent Control Act not applicable to premises whose menthly rent exceeds Rs. 3000-High Court relying upon a contrary view of High Court in Padmanabha Rao's case declaring S. 31 as invalid-Eviction decree passed by Trial Court set aside-Parties directed to approach Rent Control Court-Validity of-Held, the law laid down by Supreme Court is binding

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.