Supreme Court of India
Meghraj Urkudaji Temple v. State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid findings we do not find any merit in the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed as such.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Service law: Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 : Rule 10(4)(a)(i). c Compulsory Retirement-Procedure of-Employee attaining prescribed age or completing prescribed length of service-Review of-Circular dated 1-9-1983 provided for review on the employee attaining the age of 50155 years-Employee's case not reviewed on his attaining the age of 50 years But his case reviewed on his crossing the age of 50 years and was compulsorily retired-Permissibility of-Held, In view of clear instruction in Circular dated 12.5.1986, review was permissible even after employee crossed the age of 50
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.