Supreme Court of India
State of Andhra Pradesh v. N. Radhakishan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law : Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1963: Rule 19. c Departmental Enquiry-Delay in conclusion of-Not explained .Proceedings-Vitiating of-Promotion-Effect of-Employee recommended for promotion by DPC during pendency of charge memo-Subsequently, two charge memos served on employee-Held: No pre-determined principles applicable to all cases and all situations can be laid down-Each case has to be examined taking into consideration all relevant factors-Court has to balance between clean and honest administration and the prejudice that delay causes to the employee-Further
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Om Prakash Chautala v. Kanwar Bhan and Others
- 2013 Shri Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society and Ors.
- 2012 The Secretary, Min.of Defence & Ors. v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha
- 2019 Union of India Thr. Secretary & Ors. v. Udai Bhan Singh
- 2015 Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. Union of India through its Secretary & Anr.
Of those, 3 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.