Supreme Court of India
State of Gujarat v. Mohammed Atik and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result we allow these appeals and set aside the impugned order and permit the prosecution to make use of the confessional statement, recorded B under Section 15 of TADAA of the accused who are now facing trial.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Criminal law : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities [Prevention] Act, 1987. Section 15-Confessional Statement made by accused in earlier cases Covers, another crime involving the accused-Admissibility of-Held Admissible and can be used in the case in which the other crime is under trial. Section 15{1]-Maker of the confession dies before conclusion of trial- Ejfect of on co-accused-Held-Such confessional statement not applicable to co-accused. Evidence Act, 1872 : Section JO-Statement made by one conspirator-When can bind another conspirator-Expression "in reference to their common
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Mohd. Jalees Ansari and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2013 State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 explained
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.