Supreme Court of India
Mohan Karan v. State of U.P. and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the order of the High Court is sustained though for different reasons.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Service law : Seniority : U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973/U.P. Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985-Rules c 3,7,28,37/U.P. Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991-Rules 3,6,2,4, (/) and (g)-Promotion of second respondent as Chief Town Planner, who joined service in the feeding cadre of Town Planner much earlier to the respondent- Held: Valid as per Rule 6 of the U.P. Government Servants' Seniority Rules- 1nter-se Seniority shall be counted on the basis of Seniority in the feeding cadre-This Rule overrides Rule 7 of the U.P. Development Authorities
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Karunesh Kumar & Ors
- 2013 Essa@ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Stf, Cbi Mumbai, Part-ii
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.