Supreme Court of India
A. Deivendran v. State of Tamil Nadu
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Sections 306, 307, 306(4) and 460 (g)-Pardon to Co-accused--Grant of-Matter committed to Sessions Judge- Pardon granted by Chief Judicial Magistrate after commitment of case- Power to grant pardon lies only with the court to which commitment is made-Held, after commitment of the proceedings the Sessions Judge had no power to remit the matter for grant of pardon to the Chief Judicial Magistrate and the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate tendering pardon is without jurisdiction not curable under Section 460(g) of the Code-Evidence of approver cannot be relied
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2014 Chandra Prakash v. State of Rajasthan
- 2023 A. Srinivasulu v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- 2021 Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors.
- 2016 State through Cbi, Chennai v. V. Arul Kumar
- 2014 P.C. Mishra v. State (c.b.i.) & Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.