Supreme Court of India
Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed, the judgment dated 8.2.1994 passed by the trial court is set aside and the appellant is F acquitted of all the charges.
Judgment, page 21
From the headnote
Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987-Penal Code 1860; Criminal Trial-S.302/34 1PC read with S.3(2) of the Act-Interested Witness-Prosecution relying on evidence of f amity members of the deceased-No independent witnesses examined-Enmity between accused and f amity members of the deceased-Such witnesses testifying the presence of a dead person along with the accused at the place of incident-Conviction on the testimony of such witnesses whether sustainable-Held, witnesses who are related to the deceased are as competent to depose the facts as any other witness----Mere
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
- 2025 P Krishna Mohan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- 2011 Bhajan Singh @ Harbhajan Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.