Supreme Court of India
K. Jayamohan v. State of Kerala and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above settled legal position, no error is found in the judgment of the High Court warranting interference.
Judgment, page 2
From the headnote
Service Law : Appointment-Candidate interviewed and kept in select list-But not appointed-High Court holding that he acquired no absolute right to appoint- ment and it is not incumbent upon the authorities to appoint him--011 appeal held, merely because a candidate is selected and kept in waiting list, he does not acquire any absolute right for appointment-Even if there is a vacancy it is not incumbent 11po11 the Government to fill up the sam-Hence no inteif erence called for. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3384 of 1997. From the Judgment and Order dated 25.7.96 of the Kerala
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 The National Textile Corporation Ltd. v. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad & Ors.
- 2007 State of M.P. and Ors. v. Sanja Y Kumar Pathak and Ors.
- 2007 State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Jagdish Chopra
- 1998 Mohd. Hadi Raja Etc. v. State of Bihar and Anr.
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.