Supreme Court of India
State of Tripura and Ors. v. Sudhir Ranjan Nath
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the fees levied by the said sub-rules is regulatory in nature, the said levy must be held to be valid and competent, being fully warranted by Section.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Indian Forest Act, 1927: Sections 41 and 76(d). Tripura Transit Rules--Rule 3(8)-Timber and firewood-Quantity to be exported from State-To be detennined on basis of availability of forest produce after catering to needs and requirements of local people of State-Validity of-Held: Rule 3(8) fell within the power of State Government under S. 41 of the Act "to regulate transit of timber and other forest produce''-Power to ''regulate" includes power to prohibit in the context of sub-role (8)-Further, sub-role (8) was not only relatable to S. 41 but also to S. 76(d) inasmuch as it was intended to
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 State of Gujarat and Others Etc. v. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya Etc.
- 2017 State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher
- 2012 Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.