Supreme Court of India
National Human Rights Commission v. State of Arunachal Pradesh and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India : Article 21-Chakmas settled in Arunachal Pradesh-Persecution of by • c local people in order to force them to leave the State-Held, State is bound to protect life and liberty of Chakmas residing within the State--Any ettempt to forcibly evict or drive them out shall be repelled. Citizenship Act, 1955/Citizenship Rules, 1956 : S.5-Rules 7, 8, 9, I 0, 1I, I 2·-Citizenship by registration-Chakmas settled in Arunachal Pradesh for over two decades-Applications by them for citizenship-Held, authority to register a person as a citizen o.f India is vested with the Central
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (retd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2024 IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
- 2023 Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2024 IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES versus
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.