Supreme Court of India
H.M.T. Ltd. v. H.M.T. Head Office Employees Association and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid decision and inasmuch as the strike in the present case in all the five undertakins at Bangalore has been held to be illegal, therefore, no wages for the strike period could have been awarded in favour of the workers.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
Labour Law: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Sections 22(1) (d), 23(a) & (c), 23, 24 (3) and JO Strike Illegal but justified-Wages for such strike period-Entitlement National Industrial Tribunal found strike to be illegal, though justified, being in contravention of Ss. 22 (I) ( d) or 2 3 (a) or (c) of ID Act and awarded wages for such strike period-Held: Wages/or strike period, not payable-Even if strike was justified, no wages for strike period could have been awarded. c Lock out--Legality of-Illegal strike officially called off but workmen, though reported/or duty, continued their
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.