Supreme Court of India
K.K. Sidharthan v. T.P. Praveena Chandran and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Negotiable Instrnments Act, 1881-Section 138 r/w 149-Dishonour of cheque because of 'stop payment'-Complaint u/s 138-Main tainability-Notice was issued to the payee or holder in due course not to present the cheque for encashment-Payee or holder in due course presenting the cheque-cheque returned on instruction-Sec. 138 held not ap plicable-complaint liable to be quashed. Respondent filed a complaint against the appellant u/S 138 r/wS 149 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Section 480 IPC r/w Ss 190 & 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging that the appellant petitioner had
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 M/s. Laxmi Dyechem v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- 2014 M/s Shaha Ratansi Khimji & Sons v. Proposed Kumbhar Sons Hotel P. Ltd. & Ors.
- 2003 T. Lakshmipathi and Ors. v. P. Nithyananda Reddy and Ors.
- 1998 Modi Cements Ltd. v. Shri Kuchil Kumar Nandi
Of those, 1 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.