Supreme Court of India
Union of India and Anr. v. Madhav S/0. Gajanan Chaubal and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the roster point No. 4 in the vacancy of the Secretary reserved for the Scheduled Tribes was valid and constitutional.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Service Law : Promotion-Reservation i1t-Single post-Rule of rotation and roster point-Tribunal holding that no reservation could be granted to the reserved • candidates as it would amount to 100% reservation and therefore the promo- tion made was unconstitutional-On appeal held, even though there is a single post, if the Government have applied the rule of rotation and the roster point to the vacancies that had arisen in the single point post and were sought to be filled up by candidates belonging to reserved categories at the point on which they are eligible to be considered such a rule is
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.