Supreme Court of India
Smt. Sneh Prabha v. State of U.P. and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the appellant is not entitled to the benefit of the Land Policy.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 : Section 4( 1) Land Acquisition-Issue of Land Policy by State-Benefits under given c only to person whose land was acquired-Person musr be owner on the date of publication of notification for acquisition of land-Appellant purchasing land after publication of notificatiort-Not entitled to benefits of Land Policy. Constitution of India, 1950: Article 14. Land Acquisition Proceedings-Issue of Land Policy by State-Benefit of Policy-Denial of-To persons who purchased land after publication of notification for acquisition-Said benefit given to three co-owners as a
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Kn Aswathnarayana Setty (d) Tr. Lrs. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- 2013 The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation v. Subhash Sindhi Cooperative Housing Society Jaipur & Ors,
- 2012 V. Chandrasekaran & Anr. v. The Administrative Officer & Ors.
- 2023 C.S. Gopalakrishnan Etc. v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Others
- 2019 Shiv Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.