Supreme Court of India
Karnel Singh v. The State of M.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 376-Rape of a labourer by contractor-Convicted by Courts below-Absence of marks of injury on the person of victim-Satisfactorily explained-No reason to implicate the accused-Loopholes in investiga tion-Not to help the accused at the cost of poor prosecutrix-Conviction upheld. According to the prosecution, the prosecutrix was working at a factory of the appellant-contractor. On the morning of28.8.1987 she was working inside the factory along with a male labourer. The appellant and his companion came to the factory premises asked the male labourer to fetch tea
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Madan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2023 Dakkata Balaram Reddy & Anr v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
- 2012 Dayal Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttaranchal
- 2010 C. Muniappan & Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2022 Ashok Kumar Singh Chandel v. State of U.P.
- 2022 Varsha Garg v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- 2016 Pooja Pal v. Union of India and Ors.
- 2015 Bablu Kumarand Ors. v. State of Bihair and Anr.
Of those, 4 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.