Supreme Court of India

District Primary Education Officer, Mahsana Etc. Etc. v. Vidotejak Mandal and Ors. Etc.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 556
Bench K. Ramaswamy and B.L. Hansaria JJ.
Decided 4 August 1995

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the High Court was, therefore, not right in holding that there is a discrimination in denying the payment of grant-in-aid to the respondents for the non-teaching staff.

Judgment, page 4

From the headnote

Bombay Primmy Education Act, 1949 : Rule 115(3)-lnstitutions mnning Single School-Wliether entitled to grant-in-aid for non-teaching staff-Held No. Respondent No. 1 is a Trust which is a recognised institution run­ ning primary education schools. It claimed grant- in-aid for one clerk and one peon, i.e., non-teaching staff. The appellants rejected the claim. When the Trust approached under Art. 226, the High Court interpreted sub-rule (3) of Rule 115 of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1949 holding that while institution running more than one school is given grant-in-aid to non-teaching

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.