Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka v. Vedanayagam
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code 1860-Clause Thirdly a/Section 300 Scope-Single injury-Stabbing with dagger on left side of chest Injury found sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death-No pre meditation-Accused intended to cause that particular injury-Whether Clause Thirdly of Section 300 /PC attracted-Held-Yes Conviction u!s 302 sustainable. This appeal has been filed against the judgement of the High Court holding that the offence would come down to Section 304 P1trt II IPC and not one u/s 302 IPC. The deceased, who was son of P.W. l's sister, was living with his mother PW 3. The accused
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Stalin v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police
- 2008 Bavisetti Kameswara Rao @ Sabai v. The State of A.P. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad
- 2006 Pulicherla Nagaraju @nagaraja Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 2002 Dhupa Chamar and Ors. v. State of Bihar
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.