Supreme Court of India
Shivappa Tammannappa Karaban v. Parasappa Hanammappa Kuraban and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant has no exclusive right to the property and accordingly, we do G not find any illegality in the decree for partition granted by the court below.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Kamataka Village Offices Abolition Act,. 1961-Sections 4 and 5- Holder of village office as Walikarki-Abolition of village office-Consequen- ces-Regrant made in name of holder of office-Property continued to be joint c family property for benefit of Hindu joint family-Grant of ryotwari patta-f'roperty became partible subject to conditions u/s 5(3). The appellant was recorded as an holder of an village office as Walikarki. On abolition of the village office under the provisions of the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, on regrant, the properties were assigned to the village office held
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 N. Padmamma & Ors. v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy & Ors.
- 1995 Sh. Lokraj and Ors. v. Kishan Lal and Ors.
- 1995 Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil and Ors. v. Balwant@ Balasaheb Babusaheb Patil (dead) by Lrs. and Heirs Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.