Supreme Court of India
Grahak Sanstha Manch and Etc. v. State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the decision in H.D. Vora's case does not require reconsideration.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948-Sections 1 & 6-Act being not a • c rent control legislation-Purpose of a requisition order may be permanent- Requisition intended to be only a temporary a"angement-Requisition may be continued only for a period of time-Continuance of order of requisition for 30 years-Unreasonable-Desirability and feasibility of providing alternate accommodation to allottee~ of requisitioned premises-ft is for State Govern- ment to consider. Premises were requisitioned under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 for the purposes of residential use and also for commercial use
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 B. K. Ravichandra & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2003 Welfare Assocn. A.R.P., Maharashtra and Anr. Etc. Etc. v. Ranjit P. Gohil and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- 2000 Maheshchandra Tripanji Gajjar v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- 1997 Rajendra Kumar Gupta and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Of those, 1 followed · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.