Supreme Court of India
L/nk. Meharaj Singh/kalu v. State of Uttar Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the case against both the appellants has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt and that they are entitled to benefit of doubt.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Indian Penal code, 1860 : I S.302-Murder-Trial oHye-witnesses not believed-All accused aquitted-On appeal High Court maintained aquittal of one and convicted the other two accused-Sentenced to life imprisonment-Held : keeping in view their unnatural conduct, it could be said that none of the witnesses had actually seen the occwrence-Accused roped in on account of misguided suspicion because of previous enmity-Conviction and sentence recorded by the High Court set aside. K. and M along with N and were challenged for an occurrence which allegedly took place on 3-11-1977 at 11.15 .Min which the
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Chotkau v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2023 Ravasaheb @ Ravasahebgouda Etc. v. State of Karnataka
- 2022 Munuwa @ Satish Etc. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- 1996 Girish Yadav and Ors. Etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.