Supreme Court of India
Bonkya Alias Bharatshivaji Mane and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the finding of the Designated Court that the appellants have committed an offence punishable under Section 3 TADA is clearly erroneous.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
JUDGMENT: J U M N T DR. ANAND. J. Twelve accused persons were tried for offences under Section 302, 307/149, 324, 147, 148 and Section 3 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activites (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as ‘TADA’) by the learned Designated Judge, Pune. Out of the said twelve accused, 6 accused were acquitted of all the charges while the five appellants herein, namely, Bonkya alias Bharat Shivaji Mane ( -5), Mandu Baliba Dombe ( -8), Ashok Baloba Dombe ( -9), Ranjar Bhausaheb Dombe ( -10) and Kaka alias Pandurang Baloba Dombe ( -11) were convicted for offences under Section…
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.