Supreme Court of India

Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Dr. Karan Singh and Others Etc.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1993] 1 S.C.R. 569
Bench Laut Mohan Sharma, S.R. Pandian, S. Mohan, B B.P. Jeevan Reddy and S.P. Bharucha JJ.
Decided 4 February 1993

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the wealth-tax, as D originally enacted was covered by Entry 86 of List I of the Constitution, and its extention to the State of Jammu & Kashmir was perfectly constitu­ tional and consequently the impugned judgment of the High Court is not correct.

Judgment, page 25

From the headnote

Wealth Tax Ac4 1957: S. 1(2), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7-Application of the Act (not including within its c purview agricultural /ands/assets) to State of Jammu and Kashmir-Held, the .- Act as originally enacted is covered by Entry 86 of List I of Schedule VII to the Constitution of India and its extension to the State of Jammu and Kashmir is constitutional. Wealth TtIJ<-Held, is a net wealth t~The tax is not upon the assets as such but is upon individuals, companies etc. with reference to 'Capital value of the assets' held by them-The tax is an annual levy on total value of all assets owned by Qll

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.