Supreme Court of India

Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Chandigarh through its Secretary. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Neutral citation

Reported as [1993] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 915

Bench Kuldip Singh and S.C. Agrawal JJ.

Decided 7 December 1993

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid factual and legal position, we have no option but to allow civil miscellaneous application of the petitioner seeking withdrawal of his writ petition.

Judgment, page 11

Where later benches applied it

2014 Sudipta Lenka v. State of Odisha and Ors. relied on
2021 Bhima Razu Prasad v. State, Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbi/spe/acu-ii referred to
2018 S. Nambi Narayanan v. Siby Mathews & Others Etc. referred to
2016 Pooja Pal v. Union of India and Ors. referred to
2013 Prof. K.V. Rajendran v. Superintendent of Police, Cbcid South Zone, Chennai & Ors. referred to
2011 Disha v. State of Gujarat & Ors. referred to
2011 Narmada Bai v. State of Gujarat and Ors referred to

Of those, 1 relied on · 6 referred to

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.