Supreme Court of India
Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Order 1, Rule lo-lmpleadment of party by Court to a suit as necessary party-Necessary or proper party-Wlzo is-Distinction between necessary and c proper partJSuit filed by a plaintiff, in possession of service station under an agreement, with lessee thereof challenging validity of notice issued by Municipal Corporation, for demolition of stntctures raised by plaintiff as unauthorised-Lessee seeking impleadment as additional defendant as neces- sary party-Wlzether Court could direct plaintiff to add lessee as defendant in suit-Wlzether Court has discretion to direct
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Nak Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Tarun Keshrichand Shah
- 2017 Mrs. Hema Khattar & Anr. v. Shiv Khera
- 2025 Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan & Ors.
- 2024 Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India v. Delhi International Airport Ltd. & Ors.
- 2020 Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
- 2013 Thomson Press (india) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. & Ors.
- 2012 Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Of those, 2 relied on · 5 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.