Supreme Court of India

Rukmini Amma Saradamma v. Kall Yani Sulochana and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1992] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 579
Bench M.N. Venkatachaliah, S. Mohan and Dr. As. Anand JJ.
Decided 16 December 1992

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the foregoing reasons, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court for re-consideration, confin- G ing itself to the revisional jurisdiction as pointed out above.

Judgment, page 9

From the headnote

Kera/a Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965: Section 2o-Revisional Jurisdiction-Scope of-Wliether revisional court has jurisdic­ tion to reappreciate evidence-Second revision to the High Court under Sec- tion 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908--Permissibility of. Civil Procedure Code, 1908: Section 115-'-Revisionallurisdiction-Ex­ ercise of-Whether High Court could reappreciate evidence. The appellant-landlady filed a petition for eviction of the first respondent-tenant froin the schedule premises, on the ground that the first respondent had committed default of rent and that she

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.