Supreme Court of India
Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. Sharad Kumar Jayantikumar Pasawalla & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976-Sections 119( 1) and 119(2 )( c )-Levy and recovery of development fee-Whether valid and authorised-Specific provision whether necessary. Constitution of India, 1950-Articles 14, 19, 21-Consiitutional validity of sections 119(1) and 119(2)(c) of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development. tct, 1976-Levy and recovery of development fee-'-Validity of. The respondents filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the Constitutional validity of Sections 119(1) and 119(2) (c) of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Devopment Ac!, 1976
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
- 2017 Federation of Indian Mineral Industries & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2013 State of Rajasthan and Others v. M/s. Basant Agrotech (india) Ltd.
- 2015 Kandivali Cooperative Industrial Estate and Another v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others
- 1996 State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. v. Smt. Malti Kaul and Anr. Etc.
- 2015 Hindustan Zinc Ltd v. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 mentioned · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.