Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Zainulabudeen (since Deceased) by L.rs. v. Sayed Ahmed Mohindeen and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons stated above, we set aside the judgment and decree of the High Court dated 17th Nov., 1987 and restore that of E the Trial Court as affirmed by the First Appellate Court with modifica tions as stated earlier.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Indian Limitation Act, 1963: Adverse possession-Claim of Among co-heirs there must be evidence of an essertion of hostile title coupled with possession and enjoyment. Mohd. Zainulahdeen and Yasin Bi filed a suit for declaration that they were entitled to be in enjoyment and possession of Saint Syed Moosa Shah Khadiri Dargah in Madras for 27 days and to restrain the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' aforesaid right and management in the Dargah. c In reply the defendant No. I alleged that in the management of the Dargah, female members had no right nor could they claim the right
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 B. R. Patil v. Tulsa Y. Sawkar & Ors.
- 2003 Md. Mohammad Ali (dead) by Lrs. v. Sri Jagadish Kalita and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.