Supreme Court of India

Gram Panchayat, Village Kanonda, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Rohtak, through its Sarpanch v. Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Haryana, Chandigarh and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [1989] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 576
Bench K.N. Saikia, K. Ramaswamy and M. Fathima Beevi JJ.
Decided 24 October 1989

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In the result we allow this appeal, set aside the impugned order of the High Court and restore that of the Director, Consolidation.

Judgment, page 15

From the headnote

East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Frag­ mentation) Act 1948/East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Preven­ tion of Fragmentation) Rules 1949-Sections 21(2) and 42/Rule JS-­ Confirmation of Scheme-Whether tantamount to an order under the Act-Limitation period provided in Rule 18-Whether attracted. The appellant-Panchayat owned 1200 Bighas of land in Village Kanonda Dist!. Rohtak in Haryana. Scheme of consolidation of Hold­ ings under Section 20 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act 1948 was confirmed on 15.1.1974, as a result

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.