Supreme Court of India
Sharad Kumar Tyagi v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In the result we do not find any ground for quashing the order of detention passed against the petitioner.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
National Security Act 1980 Sections 3(2), 7(2) and 11-Detenu Demanding Chauth for gundagardi of mango-On refusal to pay Threatening contractors and shop-keepers-Reports lodged with police-Whether incidents affect 'Law and Order' or 'maintenance of public order'-Detention order-Whether valid. Advisory Board-Representation by friend-Duty of detenu to make the request. · Detention order-Challenge to-On ground of delay in arrest of c detenu-When sustainable. On April 5, 1988 an order of detention was passed against the petitioner in the writ petition under s. 3(2) of the National Security Act.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.