Supreme Court of India
Lakhanpal National Ltd. v. M.R.T.P. Commission and Another
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons mentioned above the impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is allowed, but in the circumstances, without costs.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969: Section 36A(l)(i) and (v)-Unfair Trade practice-Test to be applied Examine whether representation contains a false statement-Contains an element of misleading a reasonable person. c The MRTP Commission-respondent-in the appeal issued a show cause notice under Section 36- of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 to the appellant company informing that a proceeding had been instituted for making an inquiry whether the said Company was indulging in certain unfair trade practices prejudicial to the public interest within
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 B.B. Patel & Ors v. Dlf Universal Ltd
- 2024 Yash Raj Films Private Limited v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi & Anr.
- 2015 Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. v. The Director (research) Forand on Behalf of Deepak Khanna & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.