Supreme Court of India
Sushil Kumar & Anr. v. Ram Prakash & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons aforesaid we affirm the judgment and decree made by the High Court and dismiss the appeal without any order as to costs. "" JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. I agree that this appeal should be G °'( dismissed but I add a few words of my own.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Specific Relief Act, 1963-The right of a coparcener to maintain a suit for permanent injunction under section 38 of, restraining the mana- l ger or Karta of Joint Hindu Family from alienating or selling the joint Hindu coparcenary property-Whether such suit is maintainable. - ' Per . . Ray, J. c -y The defendant-respondent No. I, Ram Prakash as Karta of a Joint ' Hindu Family executed an agreement to sell the suit property and received a sum of Rs.S,000 as earnest money. He, however, refused to execute the sale deed. The defendant No. 2 Jai Bhagwan, instituted a suit in the Court of the
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 M.R. Vinoda v. M.S. Susheelamma (d) by Lrs. and Others
- 2020 Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.
- 2019 Vijay A. Mittal & Ors. v. Kulwant Rai (dead) Thr. Lrs. & Anr.
- 2023 Prakash (dead) by Lr. v. G. Aradhya and Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.